Tillkännagivande

Tillkännagivande Module
Minimera
Inga tillkännagivanden ännu.

Eon 3 and tweaking initiative rules

Sidnamn Module
Flytta Ta bort Minimera

Senaste inlägg

Senaste inlägg Module
Minimera

Diskussioner Statistik Senaste inlägg
Skapad av Flanellkatt, 11 February 2019, 05.26
191 responses
12.148 visningar
2 gillar
Måns
av Måns
 
Skapad av entomophobiac, 15 February 2019, 16.40
100 responses
2.021 visningar
2 gillar
Swedish Chef  
Skapad av clarence redd, Igår, 20.12
3 responses
88 visningar
4 gillar
clarence redd  
Skapad av Sysp, Igår, 22.33
1 response
71 visningar
0 gillar
luddwig
av luddwig
 
Skapad av michael, Igår, 10.00
23 responses
286 visningar
0 gillar
Oldtimer  
Skapad av God45, Igår, 20.04
2 responses
113 visningar
1 gillar
slanfan
av slanfan
 
Skapad av ceruleanfive, 15 February 2019, 11.45
6 responses
117 visningar
2 gillar
Arrikir
av Arrikir
 
Skapad av God45, 15 February 2019, 19.35
20 responses
537 visningar
0 gillar
God45
av God45
 
Skapad av krank, Igår, 11.43
1 response
44 visningar
0 gillar
luddwig
av luddwig
 
Skapad av krank, 11 February 2019, 22.42
12 responses
296 visningar
0 gillar
Khan
av Khan
 
X
Konversationsdetalj Module
Minimera
  • Filtrera
  • Tidsrymd
  • Visa
Rensa All
nya inlägg

  • Eon 3 and tweaking initiative rules

    I hope a discussion about Eon 3 is okay:

    So we've played a session with the rules and enjoyed them a lot (Later, we'll be doing an Eon 4 game too, but right now, 3 is probably what appeals the most though both are fantastic games).

    Everything went fine but the initiative rules (VINIT) sticks out a bit to me.

    Notably: It seems that the chances of winning the initiative once you are on defensive are very low, particularly for a less experienced character.
    That's obviously realistic, but it's one area where I feel like easing up on realism might make for a better game, at least for my particular players.

    In your Eon 3 games (current or long gone) did you tweak or change the initiative rules?

    I suppose adopting 4's approach of basing it on who wins the defensive roll would be a simple solution but I'd like to still have SI be a factor for weapons.

    Thoughts? Ideas?

  • #2
    I haven't tweaked the initiative rules in my eon 3 game. Using weapons with high SI factors, letting a big and tough character use shieldbashes, or having a mage with the effect "insikt" might be viable ways of taking the initiative. Heavily armored people who fight against an opponent that doesn't do much damage could consider "motanfall" to put the opponent on the defensive. Also, when your opponent uses "anfalla kraftfullt" you'll have -1obt6 to retake the initiative (though they do +1obt6 damageif they hit).

    Kommentera


    • #3
      All good suggestions on tactical approaches, thanks.

      Kommentera


      • #4
        As another thought:

        I know that the high chance of fumbles at higher difficulties is a commonly voiced concern.

        I haven't played enough yet to say if that's something I agree or disagree with, but an easy fix I thought about today is:
        Whenever the book says to add or remove dice, add or remove +/- 3 instead.

        So if you'd normally roll 5D, roll 3D+6 instead.

        (this isn't too far off Eon 4's difficulties really).

        This way, fumbles become a bit less common and difficult actions are not quite as insurmountable (but also reduces the chance of exceptional luck a bit)

        Kommentera


        • #5
          You should really play Eon IV its a much better game IMO.

          But don't change the role to + format. Make fumbles only happened when role 3 6:s (same with a perfect hit)

          Kommentera


          • #6
            I find I like both equally. 3 is a bit more "hard simulation" ala games like Harnmaster or GURPS, while 4 is more of a Burning Wheel style game.

            Appreciate the input.

            Kommentera

            Arbetar …
            X