Tillkännagivande

Tillkännagivande Module
Minimera
Inga tillkännagivanden ännu.

Eon 3 and tweaking initiative rules

Sidnamn Module
Flytta Ta bort Minimera

Senaste inlägg

Senaste inlägg Module
Minimera

Diskussioner Statistik Senaste inlägg
Skapad av Bifur, 13 November 2018, 18.04
7 responses
227 visningar
4 gillar
PAX
av PAX
 
Skapad av Inkognito, Igår, 20.46
1 response
68 visningar
0 gillar
RedMoon
av RedMoon
 
Skapad av Dunkel, 13 November 2018, 20.41
14 responses
262 visningar
6 gillar
Dunkel
av Dunkel
 
Skapad av PalMer, 07 November 2018, 16.10
41 responses
1.921 visningar
0 gillar
Gurgeh
av Gurgeh
 
Skapad av Zire, 04 November 2018, 17.14
41 responses
1.044 visningar
0 gillar
CapnZapp  
Skapad av chrull, 09 November 2018, 17.52
19 responses
271 visningar
0 gillar
anth
av anth
 
Skapad av McAber, Igår, 10.55
1 response
75 visningar
1 gillar
illuzive  
Skapad av clarence redd, 13 November 2018, 20.42
2 responses
61 visningar
1 gillar
clarence redd  
Skapad av Pendragon, 09 October 2018, 20.39
15 responses
1.271 visningar
6 gillar
avatarex  
Skapad av Khan, 13 November 2018, 15.21
8 responses
142 visningar
3 gillar
Måns
av Måns
 
X
Konversationsdetalj Module
Minimera
  • Filtrera
  • Tidsrymd
  • Visa
Rensa All
nya inlägg

  • Eon 3 and tweaking initiative rules

    I hope a discussion about Eon 3 is okay:

    So we've played a session with the rules and enjoyed them a lot (Later, we'll be doing an Eon 4 game too, but right now, 3 is probably what appeals the most though both are fantastic games).

    Everything went fine but the initiative rules (VINIT) sticks out a bit to me.

    Notably: It seems that the chances of winning the initiative once you are on defensive are very low, particularly for a less experienced character.
    That's obviously realistic, but it's one area where I feel like easing up on realism might make for a better game, at least for my particular players.

    In your Eon 3 games (current or long gone) did you tweak or change the initiative rules?

    I suppose adopting 4's approach of basing it on who wins the defensive roll would be a simple solution but I'd like to still have SI be a factor for weapons.

    Thoughts? Ideas?

  • #2
    I haven't tweaked the initiative rules in my eon 3 game. Using weapons with high SI factors, letting a big and tough character use shieldbashes, or having a mage with the effect "insikt" might be viable ways of taking the initiative. Heavily armored people who fight against an opponent that doesn't do much damage could consider "motanfall" to put the opponent on the defensive. Also, when your opponent uses "anfalla kraftfullt" you'll have -1obt6 to retake the initiative (though they do +1obt6 damageif they hit).

    Kommentera


    • #3
      All good suggestions on tactical approaches, thanks.

      Kommentera


      • #4
        As another thought:

        I know that the high chance of fumbles at higher difficulties is a commonly voiced concern.

        I haven't played enough yet to say if that's something I agree or disagree with, but an easy fix I thought about today is:
        Whenever the book says to add or remove dice, add or remove +/- 3 instead.

        So if you'd normally roll 5D, roll 3D+6 instead.

        (this isn't too far off Eon 4's difficulties really).

        This way, fumbles become a bit less common and difficult actions are not quite as insurmountable (but also reduces the chance of exceptional luck a bit)

        Kommentera


        • #5
          You should really play Eon IV its a much better game IMO.

          But don't change the role to + format. Make fumbles only happened when role 3 6:s (same with a perfect hit)

          Kommentera


          • #6
            I find I like both equally. 3 is a bit more "hard simulation" ala games like Harnmaster or GURPS, while 4 is more of a Burning Wheel style game.

            Appreciate the input.

            Kommentera

            Arbetar …
            X